
I have recommended the Bill Moyers Journal program in the past, tonight he will feature "a Seattle Times investigation of federal earmarks." The Times reporters that will be interviewed are David Heath and Hal Bernton. They "looked at how members of Congress have awarded federal dollars to local companies, some of those principals -- executives, employees or political action committees -- have made campaign contributions to the legislators."
I mentioned in a previous post that you can go to www.washingtonpolicy.org to read a copy of a small book entitled The Washington State Piglet Book, Connecting the dots on how government wastes your money by Paul Guppy (Vice President for Research at Washington Policy Center, a non-partisan public policy research organization in Seattle and Olympia, Washington.
This program will be part of the PBS series "Expose: America's Investigative Reports," there will be a new episode on his program once a month.
The segment already has premiered online at www.pbs.org/expose. If you miss the program they will be airing it again.
UPDATE
I was reading comments that was made to the writer of the article and this was a question and his response to a very important question:
Why can't we as American voters unite to pass a constitutional amendment to remove earmarks from this sneaky process of legislation? Each item should stand on its own merit and vote. Then each dollar could be accounted for and we could get to a balance budget.
Posted by: Bonnie | February 23, 2008 01:29 AM
We could pass a constitutional amendment. But it would seem that all it would take is a good law. Some have mentioned public financing as a way to reduce the influence of monied interests. I’m not an expert on that issue.
Congress could outlaw giving earmarks to campaign donors. They could also outlaw earmarks that benefit family members.
Citizens Against Government Waste are calling on members of Congress to take the following pledge:
FIRST, fully disclose all earmarked funding or targeted tax benefit requests (or substitute letters to agencies) on my Congressional website.
SECOND, not request any earmarked funding that would come from a federal program that is not currently authorized by Congress.
THIRD, not request any earmarked funding or targeted tax benefit provision that does not serve a federal interest and/or have a federal nexus.
FOURTH, not request any earmarked funding or targeted tax benefit provision for an entity located outside of the state I represent.
FIFTH, not request any earmarked funding or targeted tax benefit provision that would be directed toward a specific private entity that was not requested by an agency.
SIXTH, not request any earmarked funding be added or increased in a conference
committee to an amount greater than the amount passed in either the House or the Senate version of the bill.
SEVENTH, not request any earmarked funding or targeted tax benefit provision without also requesting that the provision be included within the text of the bill.
EIGHTH, support legislation that would end the linkage between campaign contributions and earmarks.
NINTH, support legislation that requires any earmarked funding or targeted tax benefit provision be put in the text of the bill, be available for discussion at an open Congressional hearing, and be disclosed with the requesting Senator(s), amounts, recipients, and purpose at least one week before the bill is brought to the floor.
TENTH, support any amendment in Committee, or on the Floor of the Senate, that eliminates an earmarked funding or targeted tax benefit provision that does not comply with this pledge.
Seattle, Bellevue, Queen Anne, Wallingford, Green Lake, Fremont and Redmond, Washington Real Estate Property Listings. Just click on the blue "homes search" button and then click on the area you wish to view. You can also search by street address or the MLS number.